FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • I messed up Candlehead's template page. Can you fix it ?   

      Loading editor
  • How are you doing?

      Loading editor
  • Hey, just wanted to let you know that I might take a while to reply to messages. Wikia does this weird thing with my account where my notifications don't show up on time or properly.

      Loading editor
    • All right! Right now I haven't messaged you anything (other than that message letting you know discussions went live in case you didn't know), and I don't think I'll have much to message you about (I hope I won't?), but I will certainly keep that in mind!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Happy Thanksgiving!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there Citrusella, the Shrek Wiki decided to change it's wordmark to make it better looking would you like to change the old wordmark for the new one? New Shrek Wiki wordmark

      Loading editor
  • I don't know if you forgot to reply to this comment (Due to your very busy. I understand.) but I never got a reponse to this comment " I was watching the sugar rush race scene on youtube and a youtuber mentions when you pause at 2:02 a marshmallow put's Adorabeezle back on track(similar to Mario Kart games when your knocked off course your being put back on the track by Lakitu). Are the racers not supposed be disqualified during the race since the game has a new racers daily and they still need to finish the race?"

      Loading editor
    • I actually didn't answer it because I don't know? I don't think we need to explicitly mention they're disqualified or not if we mention that the marshmallow puts her back on the track, but...

      If you're just asking my opinion: On a logical point, theoretically up to 6-7 racers could be disqualified since the game only puts 9 on the roster, and there are 15-16 racers.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Do how you remove fanon parts off a page? A new user named Lran66 edit's on Sticky's page was fanon and I can't seem to remove it. I managed to remove most of it.

      Loading editor
    • This is a bit long and hopefully not confusing:

      I usually revert by using the "undo" button or going to the last version of the page without the vandalism/fanon on it and editing/saving it to erase the edits that have happened since then, but because of my user rights (admininstrator and rollback types of rights), I also have access to a special tool called "rollback". Rollback can revert edits by the most recent user who edited an article, but since it's completely automatic (I can't even type an edit summary), I tend to use the other ways unless the vandalism/fanon is really obvious, so I can say more about why I reverted/undid an edit. (I would/could have done that here, if you hadn't gotten around to doing your revert, too. :P)

      Things can also be done manually, like it looks like you did. In your case, the remaining fanon was in the infobox. You can see what kind of text was removed from the raw text of the page when I removed the remainder of the fanon by looking at this diff of my edit. I happened to get rid of the remaining fanon by using an undo link that undid all the recent edits to the article. (I used the one next to your edit on this diff, which really only had the net effect of removing the rest of the fanon and some whitespace (i.e. spaces, blank lines), even though in a technological sense it also reverted your edits that fixed the article's text.)

      Here's some links in case you're interested in more in-depth explanations of all the reverting/undoing/rollback things I mentioned, here are some links:

      Please feel free to ask if anything about this was confusing!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello. As you may know, FANDOM is gradually working toward retiring the Forum feature found at Special:Forum. Forum content will be migrated into Discussions, which is already active on your community. Since your Forum has not had much activity in the last year, its content will be migrated to Discussions in the coming weeks. Please see this help page for more information about the migration process, and let me know if you have any questions.

      Loading editor
    • View all 10 replies
    • Okay! Thanks for the answer regarding wiki-style forums.

      As for how long the replies took to show up, I made three on what was essentially a test thread. I refreshed multiple times after trying them (I made the latter two after the first didn't show up), and they never showed up when I was trying to make them do so in that timeframe (I think I tried for 5-10 minutes). They were present when I checked back into the wiki about 6 hours later, so the timespan could have been anywhere from, say, 15 minutes to 6 hours or something. The two other messages I've posted to that thread (one 6 hours after the others (about 21 hours ago or so according to the page at present) and one just now) have appeared immediately. No delay, no need to refresh. All I can guess is that the page either didn't like the posts for some reason or there was some sort of increased load on Wikia as to why there was a delay on the others.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks for reporting back. We did have some issues with a few of the services that power Discussions, yesterday and also earlier today. So I think it was probably related. But please do send in reports if you see any further issues.

      Handy trick -- hover your mouse over the time-ago indication for a post or reply ("1d", "21h", etc) and you'll get a tooltip with the exact time stamp.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • HI

      Loading editor
    • If you do not reply to this with a reason for all your "hi" messages, it will be considered your only warning, and you will be blocked for making another one. (I'm usually the type to go easy, but this seems to match your user page editing MO, since all you've been doing is the same monotonous task--you've left five different "hi" messages on four people's walls (including essentially reposting a deleted one), and you're not elaborating and haven't replied to (or taken into account) any replies you've gotten.)

      Sorry if I sound cranky. I'm just being blunt.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  •  I removed that Vanellope pic off her gallery because it may be fanon.

      Loading editor
    • Do you have evidence? When I looked into it around the time that game came out, it seemed legit, and I searched again before re-adding it last night because I was wondering if perhaps it was removed for a reasoning like that.

        Loading editor
    • I looked into the game where I could find her appearence but never found one. Will you be able to reply to my comment below? 

        Loading editor
    • Forgot to reply to this (I was (and still am) in the throes of a job search and was trying to get really into it this weekend), but I think it might be promotional art, looking around. The in-game art for her looks slightly different, but enough reputable sources have the image we use included as her art that I believe it's official, even if it's not an image of gameplay including her.

      I think I'll try to look harder when I'm not so swamped.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.